Tuesday, February 25, 2014
Watchmen Chapters 11 and 12
At last our journey is at an end with the characters of Watchmen. In Adrian Veidt's search for the answer to world peace, he has come up with a plan to slaughter millions to save billions; in turn turning violent attention from man's self to an imaginary foe. In concept Veidt's plan is perfect. No more war, no more conflict, it's all at an end. Veidt is, in the darkest possible way, the true "hero" of the earth. Our protagonists have made it all the way to Veidt, but failed to stop his plan, and, if they have any hope of this whole crusade being worth anything at all, must make a compromise: they must remain silent, or the world will return to a doomed fate of war.
Except, there is only one person who has a problem with this: our dear, sugar-cube loving, ink-blot shifting detective, Rorschach. Rorschach will NOT compromise in justice, in response to the others' telling Rorschach that they must compromise, "Joking, of course... No. Not even in the face of Armageddon. Never Compromise." This really speaks volumes about the Rorschach character. In Rorschach's eyes, there can be no justice if there is to be any compromise. Things are black and white, there is good and there is evil, Rorschach would argue. Which, as I spoke of in chapters 5 and 6, is further attributed to his duality as a character. Things are only one way or the other. Most people would say that Rorschach is way to harsh, or that he is essentially crazy, that he's not a hero at all. But he is the only one willing to stand against the others and fight to let the truth be known. The only character to truly stand for justice. In my perspective, Rorschach is the "true hero" of Watchmen. Fittingly, the world of Watchmen has no place for a true hero...
After Veidt's plan is fully completed , though, is when we are brought forth a profound, if not disturbing question: Who is/are the real heroes of this story? What defines a hero in general? One could assert that, even though he is the antagonist of the book, Adrian Veidt is the hero. He's saved billions of lives, and effectively ended war on earth. Sounds like a hero, right? If we follow this line of thinking we can boil it down to: Veidt was able to compromise justice to end injustice. This is the antithesis of Rorschach's line of thinking: He is unwilling to compromise in the pursuit of justice in anyway, no matter what the cost, evil must be punished. In a way one could look at any of the characters here and present them as the hero or the villain of the story.
Watchmen breaks our 'heroes' apart and shows us what they are really made of: All powerful beings, who are ignorant and are careless towards humanity, smart, rich kids who are just in it for the thrill, masterful tacticians who are willing to put anything on the line to win, anarchists who see beyond the structures of society and simply don't care, and lastly, unflinching, uncompromising, enforcers of justice, who see only in shades of black and white. While on the surface they appear to be fantastic comic-book 'heroes', these characters are flawed beyond recognition and redefine what it means to be a "hero".
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment